Stock Images & Fonts

Depositphotos vs Shutterstock

Depositphotos offers a more budget-friendly option for self-published authors needing stock images and fonts, with lower subscription and credit prices. Shutterstock provides a much larger library of high-quality images and vectors, ideal for professional cover compositing, but at a higher cost. Both operate on subscription or credit models, but Shutterstock's expansive selection gives it an edge in versatility. For authors prioritizing cost savings, Depositphotos is sufficient; for those requiring extensive creative options, Shutterstock excels.

Pick Depositphotos

Pick Depositphotos if you need affordable stock images and fonts and your budget is tight, as its lower pricing still provides a decent selection for basic cover needs.

Pick Shutterstock

Pick Shutterstock if you want access to a vast, high-quality library of images and vectors for professional cover compositing, and are willing to pay more for that breadth and quality.

At a glance

DepositphotosShutterstock
PricingSubscription/creditsSubscription/credits
Pricing modelSubscriptionSubscription
Free optionNoNo
PlatformsWebWeb
Best forStock Images & FontsStock Images & Fonts
AI featuresNoNo
Open sourceNoNo

Depositphotos

depositphotos.com

Affordable stock images.

Visit Depositphotos

Shutterstock

shutterstock.com

Large stock photo/vector library for cover compositing.

Visit Shutterstock

See more options: Depositphotos alternatives · Shutterstock alternatives